The program for this assignment, and everything else except the README file, is due at 9 PM on Thursday, November 30, 2000. The README file is due at midnight, 3 hours later on the same day. Refer to the homework policies page for submission instructions and general homework guidelines.
The primary purpose of this assignment is to gain experience with hash tables.
In this assignment, you will create a simple spell checker. The program will read a dictionary from a file that is given as the first argument, insert the words into a hash table, and report collision statistics.
After reading the dictionary, the spelling checker will read a list of
words from
the standard input. Each word will be looked up in the dictionary.
If it is incorrect, it will be written to the standard output together
with a list of suggested corrections. (This is similar to ispell's
-a
mode.) The algorithm for
generating corrections is given below.
The dictionary will consist of a list of words, separated by whitespace. For convenience, the words will be given in lower case, so you do not need to worry about capitalization issues. You will need to insert them into a hash table that grows dynamically as necessary to hold the dictionary while keeping the load factor low enough. It is up to you to decide how to handle collisions: separate chaining, linear probing, quadratic probing, or rehashing.
Designing a good hash function is something of a black art. We have provided a separate Web page that briefly discusses some hash functions and how they work. However, you don't necessarily have to write a hash function as part of this assignment.
Because the Thanksgiving break has reduced the amount of time you will
have to work on the program, we have provided a hash function for you.
Actually, we have provided several for you
to choose from, together with a header file
that you can #include
so that they are easy to use.
If you are short on time, we suggest that you use
hashStringCRC
(with a prime table size) or
hashStringBUZ
as your hash function. However, if you
have more time, we suggest that you experiment with several different
hash functions to find out which works best (in terms of the collision
statistics).
All of the hash functions have descriptive comments in the source file. Before you choose a function, be sure to read the comments (for example, some functions work very badly with certain table sizes).
You are not required to use one of our hash functions. If you want to experiment with writing your own, please feel free. However, you should test your function thoroughly so that you can be sure that it gives you good collision statistics in a wide variety of conditions.
To help you understand how your hashing code works, you should track and report the following statistics:
Note that all but the first of these statistics will need to be reinitialized
whenever you expand the table. After you read the dictionary, you
should report the above statistics
to cerr
. If you wind
up with a collision chain longer than about 20, there is something
seriously wrong with your hash function or your collision method,
and points will be deducted. (This means that linear probing is
probably inappropriate.)
Once the dictionary has been created, your program will read a list of words from standard input. If a word is found in the dictionary, your program should produce no output. Otherwise, you should generate suggested corrections and write them, together with the original word (converted to lowercase), as a single output line. For example, suppose the input word was "Wird". The output might be:
wird: bird gird ward word wild wind wire wiry
Unlike the dictionary, the words input to your program may be in any
case. You can convert a string to lower case by including the
ctype.h
header file and using the isupper
and tolower
functions:
#include <ctype.h> ... string mystring("ABcdEFg!@KLm"); for (string::iterator nextChar = mystring.begin(); nextChar != myString.end(); nextChar++) { if (isupper(*nextChar)) *nextChar = tolower(*nextChar); }
The easiest way to generate corrections in a spell checker is a trial-and-error method. If we assume that the misspelled word contains only a single error, we can try all possible corrections and look each up in the dictionary.
Traditionally, spelling checkers have looked for four possible errors: a wrong letter ("wird"), an inserted letter ("woprd"), a deleted letter ("wrd"), or a pair of adjacent transposed letters ("wrod"). To simplify this assignment, you will only need to deal with the first possibility, a wrong letter. When a word isn't found in the dictionary, you will need to look up all variants that can be generated by changing one letter. For example, given "wird," you should look up "aird", "bird", "cird", etc. through "zird", then "ward", "wbrd", "wcrd" through "wzrd", and so forth. Whenever you find a match in the dictionary, you should add it to your output line.
Both the dictionary and the file to be spell-checked consist of
arbitrary-length words
separated by whitespace.
Your readstring
function from previous homework assignments
will be useful for
reading the files.
For convenience,
neither the dictionary nor the input file will contain punctuation.
If you would like to test your spelling checker on a "real" input file
(such as your README), you can remove the punctuation with the
tr
program. For example, you could do:
tr -c 'A-Za-z \010-\015' ' ' < README | ./assign_10 my-dictionary(You may find it instructive to study the
tr
manual page
to learn how the above command works.)
If you have a file that has already been cleaned up (so it only contains alphabetics and whitespace), you could do:
./assign_10 my-dictionary < error-filled-file.txt
You can also just type directly to stdin:
./assign_10 my-dictionaryIn that case, you'll need to type control-D at the end of your input to generate an EOF.
You may wish to create a very small sample dictionary of your own for initial testing. A slightly larger dictionary of 341 words should help you to get most of your bugs out. When you're fairly confident, you can try your luck with over 34,000 words in an all-lowercase version of the ispell dictionary.
The spell-check program should produce one line of statistical output on
cerr
, and zero or more lines of correction output on
cout
.
The statistical output should be in the format:
n expansions, load factor f, n collisions, longest chain n
where n is an integer and f is a floating-point
(double) number.
Each line in the correction output should consist of the incorrect word, followed by a colon and zero or more corrections, separated by spaces. There should be exactly one space after the colon (unless there are no corrections), and there should be no space at the end of the line. The following are examples of valid output lines:
xyzzy: foo: for wird: bird gird ward word wild wind wire wiry
If every word in the input is found in the dictionary, the spell
checker should produce no output on cout
.
As usual, we have collected the sample dictionaries and the source files into a tar archive and a zip archive so that they will be easy to download.
With one exception, there are no restrictions on your use of the
standard C++ libraries for this assignment. The single exception is
that you are not allowed to use a hash-table library! In particular,
though, you are allowed to use the string
type.
The string
type, in particular, will simplify your life
on input. You can read a word from a stream (either for the
dictionary or to spell-check it) with code like this:
string nextWord; stream >> nextWord; if (!stream) // EOF was hit.
Although you are allowed to use the library's list
class,
we would prefer that you use your own templated list class from
previous assignments. After all, that's why you put so much work into
it, right?
Also, a small word of warning: you may be tempted to use the
vector
class from the library to manage your hash
buckets. Although it is possible to do so effectively, it is trickier
than might first appear. In particular, the resize
function is not appropriate for resizing hash tables. I
recommend that rather than using vector
, you simply
manage the array of hash buckets yourself.
The code you submit will be compiled with the g++
options
-Wall
and -pedantic
. Your program should
produce no errors or warning messages when compiled with these options
on Turing. If you absolutely cannot get rid of a warning, even with
the help of the professor or the graders, document it in the README
file along with the names of anyone who helped you try to understand
the problem.
Your submission should consist of a number of files:
Makefile
make
utility.
The makefile you provide must produce an
executable named assign_10
.
assign_10.cc
README
If you wish, you can create other files to help you develop this assignment, but it is not necessary.
When you are ready to submit your program, cd
into the
proper directory (e.g., cs70/hw10
) and run the
cs70submitall
command. This command will prompt you for
the assignment number (see the top of this Web page) and will then
capture all of the source files,
Makefiles, and README files in your directory, so BE
CERTAIN that you don't have anything in your directory
besides your assignment.
If you discover a mistake in your program, you can resubmit it using the same command. You can submit as many times as you like; only the last version will be used.
Since the README file is due later than the rest of the assignment,
you may choose to submit it separately. You can do this with the
cs70submit
command:
cs70submit READMEIf you already submitted your code separately, DO NOT use
cs70submitall
to submit the README file, or it will
appear that you missed the deadline even though you were really on
time.
As usual, there are parts of this assignment that contain traps. Here are a few:
hashStringBase256
). You must reduce the hash
value yourself to make sure you don't go beyond your array
bounds.
There is more information on using C++ on Turing available in the
departmental
quick-reference guide and the
C++
quick reference guide.
You can find information about debugging in the
gdb
quick reference guide.
This page maintained by Geoff Kuenning.